Osteology of Klamelisaurus gobiensis (Dinosauria, Eusauropoda) and the evolutionary history of Middle-Late Jurassic Chinese sauropods

Citation

Moore, A. J.; Upchurch, P.; Barrett, P. M.; Clark, J. M.; Xu, X. (2020). Osteology of Klamelisaurus gobiensis (Dinosauria, Eusauropoda) and the evolutionary history of Middle-Late Jurassic Chinese sauropods. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 18(16): 1299-1393. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1759706

Cited by genera

• Atlasaurus

  Recovered Atlasaurus variably as a non-neosauropod eusauropod (equal weighting), a brachiosaurid (implied weighting), or a basal macronarian (Bayesian).

• Cetiosauriscus

  Source of the non-neosauropod eusauropod placement (near Omeisaurus), followed by later work.

• Daxiatitan

  Klamelisaurus osteology/phylogeny paper recovered Daxiatitan as a euhelopodid.

• Klamelisaurus

  Comprehensive osteological redescription and emended diagnosis of the holotype IVPP V9492; shows Zhao's 1993 diagnostic characters are not autapomorphic.

• Lapparentosaurus

  Implied-weights and Bayesian analyses recover Lapparentosaurus as a turiasaurian outside Neosauropoda.

• Mamenchisaurus
• Wintonotitan

  Recovered Wintonotitan outside Titanosauria, with Chubutisaurus and Angolatitan.

• Xianshanosaurus

  Found Xianshanosaurus labile, as a titanosaur or turiasaurian under equal weights, a lithostrotian under implied weights, and a non-neosauropod euhelopodid in the Bayesian analysis.

Cited by clades

• Euhelopodidae

  Klamelisaurus osteology paper recovering Euhelopus outside Macronaria, at Mamenchisaurus grade.

• Mamenchisauridae

  Phylogeny of Chinese eusauropods in an osteology of Klamelisaurus; their clade is Mamenchisauridae in one analysis and, with Euhelopus inside it, Euhelopodidae in the others.